Supreme law： strictly implement the requirement of closing the case within the trial limit and put an end to not accepting the case at the end of the year

　　Judicial trial data is the most intuitive reflection of the trial work, and the Supreme Court emphasized in advance that courts at all levels should "resolutely put an end to not accepting cases at the end of the year".

　　On October 17th, the Supreme People’s Court held a consultation on data analysis and judgment of judicial trials in the first three quarters of 2023. Zhang Jun, president of the Supreme Court, said that the quality, efficiency and effectiveness of trials in the first three quarters of the country have steadily increased, and it is necessary to strictly implement the requirements of the settlement rate within the trial limit, and no longer use the annual settlement ratio and settlement rate indicators, and resolutely put an end to not accepting cases at the end of the year.

　　At the chamber of commerce, the leaders of the Supreme Court and the heads of various business chambers spoke line by line in combination with detailed data reports, problems reflected in case trials and problems found in field research, and put forward opinions and suggestions on strengthening and improving the work.

　　"Since the two sessions this year, we have conducted three data meetings, and the analysis and judgment have become more and more in-depth and accurate, and a fixed mechanism has been formed. In view of the problems found in the data consultation, each business office deeply analyzes the reasons and studies the improvement measures in combination with the actual work, and has done a lot of extra-case ‘ Grasp the front end and cure the disease before it happens ’ The work of grasping the quality and efficiency of trials has achieved remarkable results. " Zhang Jun pointed out that it is necessary to give full play to the role of data consultation, and promote the modernization of judicial work with scientific research and judgment of judicial trial data.

　　Combined with the problems reflected in the data and work measures, Zhang Jun put forward three requirements:

　　First, the Supreme Law should grasp the top priority of judicial trial, pay close attention to studying, improving and perfecting work measures in view of the fact that its own trial execution is not in place, and ensure the successful completion of the trial task throughout the year. For the problem of "debt owed" in the trial work of local courts reflected by the data, it is necessary to urge and guide to seize the time to fill in the shortcomings, while ensuring high quality and efficiency, and preventing "radish from washing the mud".

　　Second, make full use of the results of the consultation, and seriously sum up and popularize the experience of the courts that rank in the top five in terms of data indicators, especially those whose work has improved significantly since this year. For the court whose work is obviously lagging behind, it is necessary to earnestly supervise and guide, and conduct pressure at all levels. The leaders in charge of the hospital and the main responsible comrades of the business department should lead a team to conduct on-the-spot investigation, find out the root cause of the problem and clarify the improvement measures. It is necessary to strictly implement the requirements of the settlement rate within the trial limit, and no longer use the annual settlement ratio and settlement rate indicators. Through scientific trial management, we will resolutely put an end to not accepting cases at the end of the year. Take the initiative to accept the supervision from all walks of life, and verify one case and one case in informed criticism for violating scientific management and leading some grass-roots courts not to accept cases at the end of the year. For cases that may occur at the end of the year, such as arrears of wages for migrant workers, we should take the initiative to judge in advance and promote the settlement as soon as possible.

　　Third, all business courtrooms should enhance their awareness of active justice, carefully study the deep-seated reasons for the increase of a case in each line, take the initiative to communicate with relevant departments and relevant courts, and do the source treatment with the concept of win-win and win-win. On the basis of giving full play to the role of "bringing in" mediation organizations, we should devote more energy to the guidance of "going out", and constantly improve the ability of people’s mediators and industry mediation organizations to resolve disputes through case guidance, business training, and attending court trials. It is necessary to give full play to the role of "answering the law" and improve the ability of judges to understand and apply the law. It is necessary to speed up the construction of the case database of the people’s courts, unify the judgment standards through typical cases, and promote the settlement of similar cases.